Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

PROHIBITION.

TO THE EDITOR.

Sir,— one can gainsay the fact that th« moral and social results of the drinking habits of Auckland or any ether community are most deplorable and disastrous. I shall even go further and say that the principle of taking revenue for the support of the State from that which produces poverty, pauperism, disease, and death is utterly indefensible and wrong. John Wesley, in 1784, wrote to Mr. Pitt saying, surely the revenue of the country was bought too dear, if it was the price drawn from the miseries of ! the people. But so it has been, and so it. is, and the question now arises whether or not by thia so-called prohibition a greater evil will be created than that which it aims to suppressThe experience of our American cousins goes to show that the attempt to legislate in thia direction has been with them a signal failure. .New York passed a law in 1854, tried it for two years, and gave it up as a bad job. Massachusetts tried it for 15 years, and repealed it as vain and injudicious, and an effort to restore it was voted down by an overwhelming majority, not later than April, 1889; Atalanta tried it, and repudiated it. Connecticut enacted a law, and repealed it for ever in 1872. Ohio did the same after a few months of bitter experience, and with regard to Maryland, it is absolutely impossible to raise the question after their short, but sad experience. Rhode Island enacted prohibition in 1853, and, after 10 years' trial, repudiated it as useless ; tried again to adopt it, and after only one year's experience of financial and moral disaster abandoned it for ever. And so with Michigan, Indiana, and Nebraska; all, all, with the exception of poor Maine, which has more liquor sellers in, proportion to its size than any other State in the Union. The curse of the liquor traffic in Auckland at present is that the law as it exists is not enforced. Sly drinking after hours and Sunday drinking are the rule and not the exception, and the police seem to be powerless or apathetic. What will Auckland become, if the prohibitionists are returned, aijd the hotels are closed ? A city of clubs and brothels.—l am, etc., A Freeman.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NZH18910502.2.9.4

Bibliographic details

New Zealand Herald, Volume XXVIII, Issue 8556, 2 May 1891, Page 3

Word Count
384

PROHIBITION. New Zealand Herald, Volume XXVIII, Issue 8556, 2 May 1891, Page 3

PROHIBITION. New Zealand Herald, Volume XXVIII, Issue 8556, 2 May 1891, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert