Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

RICHMOND WATER SUPPLY

I To The Editor] ] ; Sir. Regarding the water loan proposals which were recently before the ratepayers. Mr Heslop, as president of the Stoke-Richmond branch of the New Zealand Farmers’ Union. has! questioned the matter of holding the j ratepayers' meeting close to the polling day and also asked per medium of .your columns what implication is to be ; made of my remarks at that meeting, j "That the issue was for the ratepayers to decide and it was npt for .the Council or for the Farmers’ Union' or any other body to dictate what sjho.uld' be done ” Now. the Council was very desirous that all the facts in connection with the proposals should be thoroughly understood by the ratepayers. A report setting out the proposals in I detail arid the'amount of rate and the method of raising the rate, in fact. ail ( the salient facls of .the case, was publi.shcd ifl "The Mail” of 17th April. A - t.hp.bgh ip P.Ot .now mgpdatory to hold a ratepayers’ meeting jp connection with a loan proposal, the Council thought if advisable to hold such a meeting, and considered that it would be best to hold it some little lime after the" published statement. This would alloy.' the matter to be thoroughly examined and discussed by the different ratepayers. It wg? hoped that interest would be stimulated, and it gave everyone ample opportunity" to study the question and be more ready with any questions on the night of'(he meeting, if any points had not been made clea'-. At the meeting, although some of the points were elaborated no new matter was introduced. With regard to what was implied by my opening remarks at lhat meeting, there was no other implication than that which my words conveyed. The Council favoured the proposals, the Sloke-Rjciimond branch of the Farmers’ Unjon as (heir letter over' the signature of the' president and secretary of 29th April. ' took care to inform us. opposed them; but the responsibility. and it was a big one. was on the ratepayers.—l am. etc.. A. R TUFFNELL. Mayor. Richmond. Bth May.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NEM19390509.2.89

Bibliographic details

Nelson Evening Mail, Volume LXXIII, 9 May 1939, Page 7

Word Count
350

RICHMOND WATER SUPPLY Nelson Evening Mail, Volume LXXIII, 9 May 1939, Page 7

RICHMOND WATER SUPPLY Nelson Evening Mail, Volume LXXIII, 9 May 1939, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert