Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

INFLUENZA COMMISSION.

(United Press Association) DUNEDIN, This Day. - Before • the Influenza Commission at Dunedin, Dr. Ghamptaloup, Professor of Bacteriology . and Public Health, said the World’s leading authorities had divergent. views on the disease. Expert opinion at present, was divided iyyp lines, one, believing that the influenza: bacillus was;the primary cause, and other -a micro organisms secondary invaders alter the way had been prepared for them- Other experts believed that, the real,.cause .was a filter passing virus too small to be recognised by , tile microscope, and that the influenza bacillus and other micro organism:.l; were ..all secondary, Anvadors. A,t present experimental evidence in support of the second view was needed. Dr. Chamtaio.up handed'in a report from the. medical school in the scientific aspects of the epidemic, presenting .clinical and bacteriological aspects. ; The , results agreed, very closely wjth tiibse obtained in America, whilst workers in Australia were finding similar conditions., Ip the light of pre-sent-day knowledge, we could expect very little help in preventing future epidemics : fiw>m Jprotectiv© (inocuJatjib n by moans bl bacteriological vacmes madeit-roto micro, organisms found to be most frequently present : in the tissue:,of severe; cases! He was of opinion tfiatprotective inoculation . gave ip ' firyiny . ©I., those;, inoculated a. varying, and Very, slight degree of protection, sufficient. in ; some., cases to all the difference 'between a naild attack on one hand and a severe . or > fatal; attack on tbe, other. THp ideal condition yo>dd be to administer the vaedne before the epidemic appeared, for there was a tfrtain amount of risk in. giving, it for persons who might be incubating tuC disease. -'. For this reason apd the red; son that the protection. afforded was piabiomatiic, he did Inert) recommend wholesale inoculation (luring the last There were two classes oi people, however, for. whom the vaccine . should ,be available as soon .as an epidemic was likely,, viz., doctors, nurses, and voluntary,. workers, and those who for any reason had an unusual dread of. the disease. ’ To these people inoculation would, give confidence, apart from specific protection, and, .there could bo no doubt that, fright contributed to the deaths. Speaking on improvements > m the health service, ho considered active control of the Health ami Hospital Services was now too much for one mam and suggested a Director-General with a Deputy Chief Health, Officer and ; a Deputy Inspector-General of Hospitals 5 also that the.,four central, di?tries? be divided, and Junior medical officers be stationed^ma^gu^ab^^sub^enU'es.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NEM19190331.2.51

Bibliographic details

Nelson Evening Mail, Volume LIII, Issue 76, 31 March 1919, Page 7

Word Count
402

INFLUENZA COMMISSION. Nelson Evening Mail, Volume LIII, Issue 76, 31 March 1919, Page 7

INFLUENZA COMMISSION. Nelson Evening Mail, Volume LIII, Issue 76, 31 March 1919, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert