Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

IS POOL LEGAL?

IMPORTANT TEST CASE

AFFECTING ALL BILLIARD SALOONS.

WELLINGTON, April 12. The Appeal Court to-day is hearing John Jackson's appeal against h?s conviction for keeping a common gam-ing-house. He is a billiard saloon proprietor, and allowed pool to be played. He also allowed ordinary billiards, for which the loser of the game paid for the table. In billiards no stake was played for, and in pool each contestant put in 6d or Is per game, the winner taking the lot and paying for the table. • Mr Earl, of Auckland, is for the appellant, and the Solicitor-General for the police. This is a , test case, and if the conviction is affirmed other billiard-room keepers will be proceeded against.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NA19110412.2.20.5

Bibliographic details

Northern Advocate, 12 April 1911, Page 5

Word Count
119

IS POOL LEGAL? Northern Advocate, 12 April 1911, Page 5

IS POOL LEGAL? Northern Advocate, 12 April 1911, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert