Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

WEDNESDAY

ELECTIVE EXECUTIVE BILL. Major Steward moved the second reading of the Elective Executive Bill, to provide for the election «of the Executive Council. It was, he said, the moat important Bill that could be brought before the House, as it carried to a logical conclueion the lib' ml doctrine of the government of the people by the people. He conteuded that if the Bill could be sent to the people, under the referendum clause, which it was proposed to insert in committee, it would be adopted by o large majority. Mr Willis pointed out that all our great liberties and reforms had been obtained by means of party government, and he had heard nothing to warrant him in enpporting any alteration in the present system,.

Mr Barclay believed the Bill was as bad a one as could be introduced. It was a gross error for any Liberal to support this Bill, which was a Conservative device to put a clog on the wheels of progress.

Sir J. Ward remarked upon the conspiracy of silence on the part of some members on an important question like this, and said he wished to put on record his protest against the Bill. In his opinion the Bill proposed to create a Bystem of intrigue and underhand procedure which would bring discredit on the House and country.

Mr Seddon warned members that' undor this Bill the House would be brought ioto conflict with the representatives of the Grown ; in other words, they would be setting at defiance the representative of the Crown, and a great constitutional change like this would mean cutting the painter with the Old Country. Another objection to the Bill was that it would talce away the power of the people, in that at present a Ministry were liable to be challenged from day to day during the session, but under this Bill, after the start of the session, the Government could not bo further mv pench«k Xbo debate was adjourned,

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/NA19010720.2.23.5

Bibliographic details

Northern Advocate, 20 July 1901, Page 5

Word Count
331

WEDNESDAY Northern Advocate, 20 July 1901, Page 5

WEDNESDAY Northern Advocate, 20 July 1901, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert