Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CLOSER CO-OPERATION IN FOREIGN AFFAIRS

Amendment to

King’s Speech

AMBASSADORS' TO AND FROM DOMINION

[By Electric Cable—Copyright] £Aust. and N.Z. Cable Association.] (Received Sunday, 7 p.m.) LONDON, February 6. Major Astor, referring to the amendment on foreign policy, says it Interprets the feeling of many Commoners who are surprised that the jting’s speech did not mention policy regarding Dominion affairs. “I supported it because I felt we should have a definite announcement of the Government’s intention m consection -with the Imperial conferenceI would like to see stronger Dominion representation dealing with foreign affairs. Mr. S. M. Bruce (Australia) has already realised this by appointing a liaison officer. Mr. J. G. Coarea (New Zealand) recently created a foreign department. The present method .of consultation between Downing street and the Dominions on Important questions is unsatisfactory. I would like to see more adequate representation. Perhaps the status Of the Gpvernors-General and the High Commissioners could be raised more or less to the equivalent of Ambassadors.

IA London cable on February 3 stated that the following metmbers of Parliament —Major.-General Sir Newton Moore, Captain R, E, Eden, Mr. C. Greene, Mr. P. A, Hurd, Sir Hamar Greenwood, Colonel Gault, Lord Apsley. Sir A. Shirley Benn, 'arid Major Astor—have tabled an amendment in the House of Commons regretting that the King’s Speech does not indicate the steps contemplated to obtain fcloser co-operation with the component parts of the Empire with the object of securing a common foreign policy, to which the Dominions can subscribe, while retaining their freedom of action for each entity in its national affairs.] DOMINIONS SECRETARIAT. SUGGESTED FOR LpNDON, LONDON, February 6. It is learnt that prominent members of Parliament Interested in Dominion affairs intend submitting proposals to Mr. Baldwin to create a stronger Dominion representation in London. They suggest establishing « Dominions Secretariat. The question will be dtscuhaed atthe Imperial Conference. It is understood , that Downing Street would welcome a rearrangement, but there are many difficulties. It would Ilka the Dominions to have representatives in London of such status that, after communicating with their respective Prime Ministers, they should got together here in the form of an Imperial Conference, whereby they would directly inform Cabinet of the Dominions’ attitude. The question, however, is whether ail the Dominions are prepared to give their representatives the necessary status.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MT19260208.2.29

Bibliographic details

Manawatu Times, Volume XLIX, Issue 3265, 8 February 1926, Page 7

Word Count
385

CLOSER CO-OPERATION IN FOREIGN AFFAIRS Manawatu Times, Volume XLIX, Issue 3265, 8 February 1926, Page 7

CLOSER CO-OPERATION IN FOREIGN AFFAIRS Manawatu Times, Volume XLIX, Issue 3265, 8 February 1926, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert