Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

NOT TO OLD AT 100

TO LOOK AFTER OWN AFFAIRS. At the Supremo Court at Palmerston North yesterday Esther Southee, of Pending, married woman, petitioned for a protection order in the estate of Henry Thomas Wilkinson Southee, of Feilding, settler, and further asked that the Public Trustee be appointed manager of the estate so long as respondent lived. Mr. Ongley appeared for Mrs. Southee and Mr. H. R. Cooper for her aged husband, who is just under one hundred years of age. The providing Judge (His Honour Mr. Justice MacGregor) refused an application to take the hearing in chambers, pointing out that that course would not necessarily prevent the press from publishing the evidence, as it was quite a common thing in cases so taken in Wellington for full publication to be made. An “in camera” hearing would be quite a different thing, but as the file did not disclose any special circumstances, afio case was ordered to be taken In open court, His Honour observing the matter of publication of details could best be left to the discretion of the press. The grounds of the petition we#'C that by reason of age, physical and mental infirmities, respondent was wholly unable to manage his affairs and was allegedly subject to undue influence in. the disposition of his estate by two sons of a previous marriage; further, that, he had disposed of some of the estate and petitioner had cause to believe that he might be coerced into disposing of the whole of his property.

The answer was that respondent was quite capable of looking after his own affairs. His Honour, after hearing legal argument, said he was not satisfied a strong enough case had been made to justify interference with the personal liberty of respondent. The petition was, accordingly, dismissed, but without costs. t

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MT19260206.2.5.1

Bibliographic details

Manawatu Times, Volume XLIX, Issue 3264, 6 February 1926, Page 3

Word Count
304

NOT TO OLD AT 100 Manawatu Times, Volume XLIX, Issue 3264, 6 February 1926, Page 3

NOT TO OLD AT 100 Manawatu Times, Volume XLIX, Issue 3264, 6 February 1926, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert