Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

STORY OF A TIE PIN

WHEN IS A JOKE NOT A JOKE? YOUTH COMMITTED FOR TRIAL. After bidding good-bye at the railway station to a friend he had known in Hastings a couple of years previously, George Vining, an employee of the Independent Pictures, missed a gold and opal tie-pin from his attire. He rang up Hastings immediately, and later ascertained that his friend, Archie Wilson, had alighted from the train wearing the jewellery. Next day the pin was recovered by the police, with the explanation from Wilson ihat he had taken it as a joii>s. Vining failed to see the humour of the situation, the pin being a keepsake and valued at £6, and laid an information in Palmerston North. Accordingly accused appeared on sur.;mons before. Mr .1. L. Stout, S.M., yesterday afternoon in answer to a charge of having stolen the pin. Pie was represented by Mr W. L. Fitzherbert. The facts as above were related from the vitness-box by complainant, who also stated that accused had visited him at the Pictures on Saturday evening last and insisted that he hud taken the pin as a joke. Mr Fitzherbert said he proposed to call no evidence, and if his Worship considered a prima facie case had been made out accused would elect to go before, a- jury. Counsel submitted it was a trivial case, and that the pin was taken as a joke. No intent to convert the pin to his own use could be shown, as accused had only had it in his possession one day. The ,\lagistiate observed 'that the question presented Itself of why accused did not. hand the pin back again as the train was having, instead of carrying it away to Hastings. Such an action necessitated his return io Palmerston North to give the pin bark or else posting it. It seemed that accused should give some explanation of his conduct. Accused, after conferring with his counsel, declined to do so. expressing preference for his case to be heard by the Supreme Court. He pleaded not guilty and was committed for trial at the Supreme l Court sittings in Napier. Bail was allowed in the sum of £25 and one surety for a like amount.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MT19220516.2.58

Bibliographic details

Manawatu Times, Volume XLVI, Issue 2124, 16 May 1922, Page 7

Word Count
372

STORY OF A TIE PIN Manawatu Times, Volume XLVI, Issue 2124, 16 May 1922, Page 7

STORY OF A TIE PIN Manawatu Times, Volume XLVI, Issue 2124, 16 May 1922, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert