Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

GOODS TRANSPORT.

EXPLANATION TO FARMERS. ROAD AND RAIL FREIGHT. Per Press Association. WELLINGTON, July 16. “Your fear that the taking over or long-distance freight services by the Railways Department is a preliminary to the taking over of all forms ot goods transport is quite unfounded, said the Minister of Transport in a letter read by the president of the New Zealand Farmers’ Union. Mr Mulholland, at the annual conference at Wellington to-day. The Minister went on to say that the Government’s proposals covered only 197 trucks out of a total of 45,000 in the Dominion. The Government was not arbitrarily “strangling road transport in favour of the railways. It fully recognised that, on account of its flexibility and mobility, motor transport afforded a wonderful service for rural areas. The sole aim of tli6 Government was to increase the efficiency of all forms of transport. Experience had shown it was possible to bulk the freights of long-distance road services and haul them on the railways without deterioration in the standard of the service. While the “truck rate” system proved the practicability of co-ordinating long-dis-tance road and rail services, it had also shown that the possibilities of coordination were limited as long as the road services were organised in small units and until one ownership embraced both services. . The conference made the tollowing resolution : “That the conference entirely disagrees that ‘single ownership’ of transport services is essential t 0 efficient operation and states emphatically that if co-ordination he brought ‘about only by the elimination of the small operators it will he too dearly purchased. I lie idea should he abandoned. The mobility end flexibility of motor transport would he largely destroyed if small units were eliminated. The statement that only 107 trucks out ot 40,000 are affected shows that the action cannot affect the co-ordination of transport, as suggested, unless a very much greater extension ot control is intended.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MS19370717.2.18

Bibliographic details

Manawatu Standard, Volume LVII, Issue 194, 17 July 1937, Page 2

Word Count
317

GOODS TRANSPORT. Manawatu Standard, Volume LVII, Issue 194, 17 July 1937, Page 2

GOODS TRANSPORT. Manawatu Standard, Volume LVII, Issue 194, 17 July 1937, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert