Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

FAILURE AT GALLIPOLI.

REPLY TO SIR c. ROSENTHAL. MELBOURNE, July 12. Commenting on Sir Charles Rosenthal’s lecture, General Sir Talbot Hobbs, who was commander of the First Australian Division, said he entirely disagreed that the Gallipoli failure was Australia’s responsibility. “To say that the absence of the four guns Sir Charles Rosenthal mentioned was the cause of our failure at the landing is to my iniml absurd T think that if Sir Charles inspected the ground from Cape Holies to Suvla Bay he would realise that tboic weie manv more ridges beyond Gun Ridge and that the whole area was a vast natural fortress garrisoned by brave and resolute soldiers led by efficient generals who knew the ground and were experts in defence. Australia did her best, and that was ah she was able to do.”

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MS19360713.2.93

Bibliographic details

Manawatu Standard, Volume LVI, Issue 190, 13 July 1936, Page 7

Word Count
136

FAILURE AT GALLIPOLI. Manawatu Standard, Volume LVI, Issue 190, 13 July 1936, Page 7

FAILURE AT GALLIPOLI. Manawatu Standard, Volume LVI, Issue 190, 13 July 1936, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert