Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

PROBLEM FOR COURT.

DEAF AND DUMB DEFENDANT. HASTINGS, Dec. 6. An unusual problem in taking evidence arose in the Magistrate’s Court when a deaf and dumb husband was called as the defendant in maintenance proceedings. The Magistrate (Mr J. Miller) discussed with counsel concerned the most satisfactory method of ensuring that the purport of the wife’s evidence would be understood by the defendant, and of giving counsel an opportunity of cross-examining the defendant. The decision of the Court was that the defendant should prepare a written statement in answer to his wife’s allegations, and that his wife’s evidence should be typewritten, when the hearing of the case is resumed.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MS19351207.2.26

Bibliographic details

Manawatu Standard, Volume LVI, Issue 8, 7 December 1935, Page 2

Word Count
109

PROBLEM FOR COURT. Manawatu Standard, Volume LVI, Issue 8, 7 December 1935, Page 2

PROBLEM FOR COURT. Manawatu Standard, Volume LVI, Issue 8, 7 December 1935, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert