Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SERIOUS ALLEGATIONS

3.45 P.M. EDITION

BREACH OF PRIVILEGE. (United Press Association —By Electric Telegraph.—Copyright.) Received April 17, 2 p.m. LONDON, April 16. Mr Winston Churchill’s allegations in the House of Commons, that the series of negotiations with the Indian section of the Manchester Chamber of Commerce amounted to pressure being brought to bear upon them to procure a fundamental alteration in the evidence already submitted to the Joint Select Committee on Indian Constitutional Reform, will be investigated by a Committee of Privileges including Mr Ramsay MacDonald, Major Attlee, Sir Thomas Inskip, Mr Stanley Baldwin, Lord Hugh Cecil, Sir Austen Chamberlain and Sir A. M. Samuel. The Committee, which will sit in private, will meet immediately. Apparently there is no precedent for a Committee of Privileges dealing with allegations against a Cabinet Minister. Mr Churchill contended that full indication of the character of evidence'of the Manchester Chamber of Commerce representatives had reached Sir Samuel Hoare early in June. A dinner was held at Lord Derby’s house on June 27 at which Sir Samuel Hoare and two other Ministers were present. This was tho beginning of a long series of negotiations amounting to pressure on the Chamber of Commerce representatives, whose new statement, submitted in November, was a mere ghost of the original evidence, a poor, shrunken, emasculated thing. Though no malice or corruption was imputed, there was irregularity and impropriety enough to constitute a flagrant breach. Sir Samuel Hoare said he did not see the first Manchester memorandum until July 7, when he thought some passages would not facilitate a settlement. His efforts to obtain a modification had failed. It was only four months later, on the suggestion of the Lancashire delegation then in India, that the modification was made.

An earlier message appears on page 7.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MS19340417.2.14

Bibliographic details

Manawatu Standard, Volume LIV, Issue 117, 17 April 1934, Page 2

Word Count
296

SERIOUS ALLEGATIONS Manawatu Standard, Volume LIV, Issue 117, 17 April 1934, Page 2

SERIOUS ALLEGATIONS Manawatu Standard, Volume LIV, Issue 117, 17 April 1934, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert