Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

OIL INTERESTS

3.45 P.M. EDITION

PROTECTION OF COMPANY. (United Press Association—By Electric Telegraph— Copyright.) Received December 9, 1.20 p.m. LONDON, Dec. 8. After Captain Eden, Under-Secretary for Foreign Affairs, had made a statement in the House of Commons regarding the Note sent to Persia concerning the Anglo-Persian Oil Company’s interests, Mr G. Lansbury asked if the last sentence meant that under certain circumstances the Government proposed •to take armed jmeasures against Persia. * Captain Eden: The statement is clear. We hold the Persian Government responsible for the protection of the company’s interests. Mr Lansbury: Does it mean that in certain circumstances while the matter is being arbitrated the Government might feel compelled to take other measures ?

Captain Eden: My statement is necessarily hypothetical. The Government can only be guided by circumstances as they arise. Mr Lansbury appealed to Mr Baldwin to undertake to inform the House before measures other than arbitration were taken.

Mr Baldwin: It is impossible to enter into hypothetical questions. Captain Eden informed Captain Peter MacDonald that the Persian Government was under direct treaty to protect the company’s interests. Mr Lansbury, later, stating that lie was dissatisfied with the Ministerial statements, sought to move the adjournment of the subject as several newspapers suggested that Russia was behind Persia’s intransigence. There was loud and ironical laughter when Mr Lansbury, reading the motion, referred to the “Anglo-Persian” as the “Anglo-Russian” Oil Company. Sir W. H. Davjson: You have let the cat out of the bag now. (Laughter.) The speaker rejected Mr Lansbury s motion on the ground that it did not draw attention to a “definite matter.” Mr Lansbury: But in the event of some damage to the company’s property the Government’s statement will permit it to take action which will lead to war. The speaker qjaintaTned his ruling and said that Mr Lansbury was suggesting a purely hypothetical situation.

An earlier message relating to the above appears on page 7.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MS19321209.2.13

Bibliographic details

Manawatu Standard, Volume LIII, Issue 10, 9 December 1932, Page 2

Word Count
321

OIL INTERESTS Manawatu Standard, Volume LIII, Issue 10, 9 December 1932, Page 2

OIL INTERESTS Manawatu Standard, Volume LIII, Issue 10, 9 December 1932, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert