Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SIGNAL OR SIGNALMAN?

(Received May 2, 11.35 a.m.) SYDNEY, May 2. _ The stafionmaster at Murrurundi gave evidence to the effect that he "had no confidence in the signal, and was very careful in handling it. It had failed many times to act perfectly. The district superintendent deposed that he examined the signal after the accident, and found that by faulty manipulation the arm would not go back ip "danger. 3* The Railway Department had hundreds of similar signals, and were quite satisfied with their working.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/MEX19080502.2.18.10.1

Bibliographic details

Marlborough Express, Volume XLII, Issue 103, 2 May 1908, Page 5

Word Count
85

SIGNAL OR SIGNALMAN? Marlborough Express, Volume XLII, Issue 103, 2 May 1908, Page 5

SIGNAL OR SIGNALMAN? Marlborough Express, Volume XLII, Issue 103, 2 May 1908, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert