Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

FACE TO FACE.

Italo—Turkish firmies. TURKISH DEFEAT DENIED. CONFLICTING REPORTS. 37 ELECTRIC TELEGRAPH. COPYRIGHT. PER UNITED PRESS ASSOCIATION. Received November 2, 10.35 a.m. CONSTANTINOPLE, Nov. 1. Mahmud Shevket Pasha (Turkish Minister for War) in denying the story of the crushing defeat by the Italians states that the Turks recaptured several positions and that the armies are now face to face. TWO SIDES OF THE STORY. Reveived November 2, 9.30 a.m. LONDON, November 1. The Italian Embassy states that there' has beeen no fighting at Tripoli since the 26th \dt. The Turkish Embassy, however, asserts that the Turks penerated into Tripoli on the 25th and drove the Italians into the town next day. Fighting was renewed on the 28th, the Italians evacuating two forts. "ABOMINABLE DEEDS." Received November 2, 10.35 a.m. ROME, November 1. Indiscrininate slaughter at Tripoli is officially denied. It is asserted that the Arabs, after submitting, treacherously attacked the Italians in the rear. Only those carrying arms or who had undergone a regular trial were shot. Others favoring treachery, numbering 2200, were deported to Italian islands. In destroying the shelter oasis (outside Tripoli) care was taken to remove the inoffensive Arabs, women and children. ( On the other hand, it has been clearly established that the enemy committed abominable deeds on the wounded Italians. ITALIAN DEFEAT DENIED. ROME, November 1. Turkish reports of the defeat of Italians at Tripoli are officially declared to be baseless. ITALY AND A TREATY. THE DOMINIONS' POSITION. Received November 2, 8.5 a.m. LONDON, November 1. In the House of Commons Mr F. D. Acland (Under-Secretary for Foreign Affairs) in reply to a question regarding the treaty made by Italy in 1883 said that Great Britain was seeking to amend the treaty in order to secure the self-governing Dominions the power of separate withdrawal they enjoy in all recent treaties.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ME19111102.2.28

Bibliographic details

Mataura Ensign, 2 November 1911, Page 5

Word Count
305

FACE TO FACE. Mataura Ensign, 2 November 1911, Page 5

FACE TO FACE. Mataura Ensign, 2 November 1911, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert