Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THAT MOTOR BY-LAW.

TO THE SIHTOB. Sir, —Judging by the remarks of tho Magistrate (as reported in Saturday’s issue of your paper) during the hearing of a number of cases against motorists for leaving their cars unattended for a longer period than live minutes, the sooner motorists bestir themselves in this matter the better. According to your report, the Magistrate considered this antiquated and illconsidered by-law quite reasonable. That decision* is not surprising in view of tho Magistrate’s expressed opinion that thcro wa» no difference between leaving a car in the street and' leaving a trap there after taking the horse out, and that it wps no greater hardship for g, man to have to take his car to a garage than for a person to have to put his horse and trap in a stablo I 1 should like to point out one outstanding dissimilarity :—Of the business men who to-day use motor-ears, hardly more than 1 per cent used, in the “old days,” horses and traps in their business. That fact alone disposes of the analogy which the Magistrate set up. Tho suggestion that if cars are allowed to stand alongside the kerbing they may as well bo allowed to stand right across the street is ridiculous; and I think most professional or business men are prepared to run the risk of losing tho business of the man who is so nar-row-minded that, because a standing ear prevents him from drawing up his car directly in front of the office he is desirous of visiting, lie decides to take his business to another office! Curiously enough, the same paper that published the remarkable “ obiter dicta ” referred to above also contained the announcement of the Government's intention to take control of the supply of petrol, and of tho probability that car-owners nob engaged in “ essential ” industries may not be allowed to buy petrol. That petrol is dear enough is admitted; but without petrol what chance has a business man of getting his high-priced (as it is to-day) car to pay interest on tho investment? And when he is smilingly making the best of this bad state of affairs, lie is threatened with these silly prosecutions—and all because, unlike the Mayor (who is said to ho at the back of these prosecutions), he does not. employ u nperson to sir :n the ear while it is stationary! Reluctance to further trespass on your space causes me to say no more for the present—l am, etc-, AMUSED.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/LT19200310.2.73.1

Bibliographic details

Lyttelton Times, Volume CXVIII, Issue 18353, 10 March 1920, Page 7

Word Count
416

THAT MOTOR BY-LAW. Lyttelton Times, Volume CXVIII, Issue 18353, 10 March 1920, Page 7

THAT MOTOR BY-LAW. Lyttelton Times, Volume CXVIII, Issue 18353, 10 March 1920, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert