Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

PICTURE MANAGER FINED.

CHARGE OF EXHIBITING INDECENT PICTURE. [Per Presi Association.] AUCKLAND, July 8. Judgment was given to-day by Mf Wilson, S-M., in the case in which Robert Cleiand, manager of the National Theatre, was charged with having publicly exhibited an indecent picture. The picture in question was a photogravure exhibited! as a poster in the vestibule of the theatre advertising attractions of the film picture “Oueen of the Sea.” His Worship titated that he must! find that the vestibule was part of the . theatre and, therefore, a public place within the meaning of the Indecent Publications Act under which tho charge was laid. He further considered on the facts that one of the figures in the poster gave the impression of being tka.t of a nude woman and, in his opinion, its exhibition under the circumstances stated had a mischievous tendency and made the picture an indecent one. He accepted the statement of defendant that the photogravure was an actual reproduction of part of the film which had the unqualified approval of the censor. Defendant stated that when the picture was shown on the screen certain shades appeared which were not discernible on the photogravure. It seemed to be purely a matter of shading, but nevertheless the result in the photogravure did not meet the requirements of the Act. The management of the theatre should have recognised that the poster was one it would be better not to exhibit as they did, although in the screen picture there might be nothing to which exceptiou might be taken. Defendant would bo convicted and fined £2.

Mr Skelton, for defendant, remarked that probably there would he an appeal on both law and fact. He ask-’d his Worship to increase the fine sufficiently to enable that to be done. The Magistrate acceded to the request and raised the fine to £5 Is, with 3s costs. He also fixed security for appeal at ten guineas in addition tc the amount of fine and costs.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/LT19190709.2.34

Bibliographic details

Lyttelton Times, Volume CXVII, Issue 18144, 9 July 1919, Page 6

Word Count
331

PICTURE MANAGER FINED. Lyttelton Times, Volume CXVII, Issue 18144, 9 July 1919, Page 6

PICTURE MANAGER FINED. Lyttelton Times, Volume CXVII, Issue 18144, 9 July 1919, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert