Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

BETTING WITH AN "INFANT."

APPEAL DISMISSED. [ilY TKLKOII.U'H.—PRESS ASSOCIATION".] Napier, This Day. In the appeal case Fitzpatrick against police, where the defendant, a bookmaker, had been fined £75 fcr betting with an infant, the Chief Justice dismissed the appeal, holding that the onus of proof of age was on the defendant. His Honour refused any mitigation of the fine, adding, however, that the appellant might apply to the Crown authorities for a remission of the fine, which certainly seemed heavy. The youth in question was twenty years of age and might have been mistaken for one over.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/KCC19110311.2.31

Bibliographic details

King Country Chronicle, Volume V, Issue 344, 11 March 1911, Page 5

Word Count
97

BETTING WITH AN "INFANT." King Country Chronicle, Volume V, Issue 344, 11 March 1911, Page 5

BETTING WITH AN "INFANT." King Country Chronicle, Volume V, Issue 344, 11 March 1911, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert