Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SANCTIONS

LABOUR LEADER’S VIEWS

(United Press Association—By Electric 'Telegraph—Copyright).

(Received this day at 1.30 p.m.) PARIS, May 10. • Mr.; Attlee (British Labour 'Leader), visited M. Blum and congratulated hiip oh his electoral success. He urged th? intensification of sanctions in accordance yvitlx British Labour’s demand: It is understood that M. Blum ref plied that he agreed in principle with Labour’s policy and expressed a deter) piipation to see the League emerge from the tangle with its prestige as lit* t|e tarnished as possible. He agreed French Socialists keep in constant Contact with the British Labour.

-'A DISCUSSION ,

(Received this day at 1.30 p.m.)

GENEVA, May 10,

Scandinavian and Dutch foreign ministers discussed the European situation including thje failure of sanctions, Germany’s violation of Versailles -and the possible reform of the League. They Agreed to await a Fraiicd-British lead. There was.a general impression that an uncomfitable job must be done in the abandonment of sanctions, which Everyone prefers to-pass on "to somebody else. Immediate action ja unliae- &:■ , ' ;■ ■ • •

SMALLER STATER SUPPORT

COPENHAGEN, May 10.

i Banich (Foreign Minister at Munich), broadcasting from Geneva, declared-the smaller states strongly favoured a continuance of sanctions. 1 Abandonment pould only be on the initiative of the powers which suggested them. It was jilear the League at present was not; Strong enough" to protect tjie jyeaker jstates hgainsh-grpat military. powers.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19360511.2.43

Bibliographic details

Hokitika Guardian, 11 May 1936, Page 6

Word Count
223

SANCTIONS Hokitika Guardian, 11 May 1936, Page 6

SANCTIONS Hokitika Guardian, 11 May 1936, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert