Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

FILM DISPUTE

ALLEGED BREACH OF CONTRACT

CLAIM MADE BY DISTRIBUTORS

(Par P»ess Association — Copyright.)

WELLINGTON, November 8

A case of interest to motion picture proprietors, heard at the Magistrate's Court to-day, was a claim by R.K.O. Radio Pictures, Australasia, Ltd., film distributors, for £76 7s 7d from C. E. Gray, Auckland, formerly proprietor of the Manurewa Picture Theatre, as the result of an 'alleged breach of contract. The claim sta-ed that, under an agreement mule on September 30, 1932, the deienclan l undertook to hire and exhibit forty Ifilms. Te exhibited only five, and disposed of fiis interest in the theatre, refusing, it was alleged, to carry om the remainder of the .contract. The amount of rental due for tne films was £65, plus 50 per cent. of the gross proceeds over. £ls for each exhibition.

A further £ll 7 S 7d wa s due in respect of films previously supplied. It was stated for pi. intiffs that the new proprietor of the theatre made arrangements for films elsewhere than from.them. Jt was also stated that the question of the quality of the films was never raised, until the civ e was brought to court. It would he shown that the quality was well up to standard, and that the drop in receipts was only i,n accordance with a general decline which had been evident in the film business.

Walter Ai Kritch gave evidence for plaintiff on the lines indicated h> counsel. He denied that he told Gray there would be seventy pictures from which forty could !be selected. He had said fifty-two films would be available. H;id Gray continued under his contract, he would have had. sixtythree films to choose from.

In concluding the case for the plaintiff Mr Cousins said that it arose out of a practice among film exhibitors throughout the Dominion of blaming the .producers for the decline in the motion picture business. Mr Goldwacer said that when the contract was ‘ entered into, there had been false . representation of fact—recklessly, although not. of necessity, deliberately .falsely. If pictures d:d .not draw houses, then the picture proprietor, would be .ruined, The Magistrate reserved his decision. '

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HOG19331110.2.75

Bibliographic details

Hokitika Guardian, 10 November 1933, Page 8

Word Count
358

FILM DISPUTE Hokitika Guardian, 10 November 1933, Page 8

FILM DISPUTE Hokitika Guardian, 10 November 1933, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert