ARBITRATION COURT.

Hawera & Normanby Star, Volume XLVIII, Issue 8099, 30 September 1904, Page 3

ARBITRATION COURT.

WELLINGTON, SepkanbM 29. The Arbitration Omit lad before it to-d*v • br«*ch of tbe tailomses' prefer j enM clwiw, which, unlike notf imfance , ctaiMa, does' not emyany conditions. Thewtaowtent the Wellington , W 00l ton SwSEw «* P* rt of iße d€fen ?* wm thatthe non-unionurt was mjwty doiittaaed in hfa employment, while a uSonirt wm diimiaied. The union, wWte Grouting tbU in fact, contends that even « Ik was a owe of oontinoed employment preference meaM prefewnce not SSy in P empk>yrng, bat te J-JtafiJ^J sr£?il more competent than * unionist. JfiSpgHhl waa reterred. -