Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image

The opinion that the police had no right to veto a permit granted by the Auckland City Council' for the holding of a meeting was expressed by the Magistrate (Mr W. E. McKean) during the prosecution yesterday of James Henry Edwards and Eoderick F. Eowlands. on charges of holding a meeting in a city park on a recent (Sunday without a permit. Both admitted a technical breach, but formally pleaded not guilty in order to “discover, if possible, who has the final authority to grant permits for meetings.’ ’ Edwards said the Minister of Justice, in a letter to him, had said the City Council had sole authority in the matter, and he (Edwards) wanted to know why the police had power to veto any permit. The Magistrate again expressed the view that the bylaw should be tested in the Supreme Court and adjourned both cases for a .week to see whether an appeal is lodged in a similar ease heard recently.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HC19340908.2.66

Bibliographic details

Horowhenua Chronicle, 8 September 1934, Page 8

Word Count
161

Untitled Horowhenua Chronicle, 8 September 1934, Page 8

Untitled Horowhenua Chronicle, 8 September 1934, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert