The opinion that the police had no right to veto a permit granted by the Auckland City Council' for the holding of a meeting was expressed by the Magistrate (Mr W. E. McKean) during the prosecution yesterday of James Henry Edwards and Eoderick F. Eowlands. on charges of holding a meeting in a city park on a recent (Sunday without a permit. Both admitted a technical breach, but formally pleaded not guilty in order to “discover, if possible, who has the final authority to grant permits for meetings.’ ’ Edwards said the Minister of Justice, in a letter to him, had said the City Council had sole authority in the matter, and he (Edwards) wanted to know why the police had power to veto any permit. The Magistrate again expressed the view that the bylaw should be tested in the Supreme Court and adjourned both cases for a .week to see whether an appeal is lodged in a similar ease heard recently.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HC19340908.2.66
Bibliographic details
Horowhenua Chronicle, 8 September 1934, Page 8
Word Count
161Untitled Horowhenua Chronicle, 8 September 1934, Page 8
Using This Item
NZME is the copyright owner for the Horowhenua Chronicle. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons New Zealand BY-NC-SA licence . This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of NZME. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.