Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

ONLY £41,000.

A correspondent, whose letter appears on another page to-day, asks us a few rather pertinent questions regarding proceedings at yesterday’s meeting of the Napier Harbour Board. We are not in a position just now to answer them fully because, following many vicious precedents already set by the present Board, the main proceedings were held in committee from which the press was excluded. Thus all we have to go by is a statement supplied by the chairman, while ii formation as to the discussion that took place upon it during the four hours the Board sat in committee is withheld from the public. One thing, however, is made pretty clear and that is that the Board, having now got the ratepayers entirely in its own hands, proposes spending some £61,000 on a project that was never put before them.

Of that £61,000 some £41,000 will represent extra expenditure, the other £20,000 being represented by an item that is being .discarded. Thus we have already an addition of about 10 per cent, to the £405,000 which the Board managed to get authority to spend on the Breakwater Harbour. Beyond that there would seem to be some additional dredging which was not previously contemplated and which is obviously going to mean a further substantial increase in the total cost. There is also some vague reference to the alteration of the alignment of the breakwater extension, the significance of which cannot as yet be quite understood. What the ratepayers have to note is that there are to be very important departures from the scheme on which they were asked to vote, and txiat these will involve a very material increase in the ultimate cost. What they may well ask themselves is why, although the plans were previously under discussion for many months, these expensive variations did not suggest themselves to the Board and its engineer until after the poll was successfully carried tlfrough.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HBTRIB19340919.2.34

Bibliographic details

Hawke's Bay Tribune, Volume XXIV, Issue 237, 19 September 1934, Page 6

Word Count
321

ONLY £41,000. Hawke's Bay Tribune, Volume XXIV, Issue 237, 19 September 1934, Page 6

ONLY £41,000. Hawke's Bay Tribune, Volume XXIV, Issue 237, 19 September 1934, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert