Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CLAIM FOR DAMAGES.

THE LOSS OF A HAND. Palmerston North, June 1

An interesting claim for damag-.:-for accident has occupied the atten tion of the jury at the Supreme Court for two days. FianciS Ed* • Carson, a youth, sued Keeling a,.-> Mundy, printers, for £ls7b ikn«' o for loss of his right hand wmla ’a defendant’s employ. Plaintiff w ; as employed at defendant’s printing works, and was receiving a weekly wage of 10,-. June 14th, 1911, he was c et to w k printing small seed packets, c -.u. through the alleged faulty action oi the machine his hand w-as crirmd and injured to such an extent the.' amputation of the right hand ai.ti portion of the right arm was necessary. It was alleged that the madi inc was not in a reasonably safe condition for work so far as the exercise of reasonable care ar.d skill could make it. The injury was received while plaintiff was placing with his right hand a packet for printing on the plate prepared for that purpose, and the plates suddenly coming together, jammed his right hand. The defence denied that the injury was caused through a faulty action of the machine; denied that the • .nine was not in a reasonably safe condition for use ; denied that the machine had any of the defects mentioned or that any of them could have contributed to plaintiff’s injury ; denied that the plates came together, and that the machine suddenly stopped. The defence held further that the machine was m proper order, and alleged that plaintiff carelessly permitted his hand to remain on one of the plates of the machine for too long a thne, and the plates therefore came together and crushed his hand.

A great deal of evidence was called for both sides.

The jury, after one hour’s retirement, found for the defendants, and the case was adjourned to allow 7 the Insurance Company and plaintiff to fix compensation as allowed by the Act.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HBTRIB19120603.2.10

Bibliographic details

Hawke's Bay Tribune, Volume II, Issue 143, 3 June 1912, Page 3

Word Count
329

CLAIM FOR DAMAGES. Hawke's Bay Tribune, Volume II, Issue 143, 3 June 1912, Page 3

CLAIM FOR DAMAGES. Hawke's Bay Tribune, Volume II, Issue 143, 3 June 1912, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert