THE ENGINEER’S ADVICE.
On the other hand it is amusing to ‘ see the anxious efforts made by! the old Breakwater Party to find ; something in Mr. Ferguson’s re-: marks to the Board which may be j turned to account. Mr. Ferguson. , however, gave them little ground , to work on. The most that can be, said is that he did not declare him- ’ self a straight-out advocate of the ! inner harbour, neither did he open-; ly condemn the breakwater. As we { stated yesterday. Mr. Ferguson; definitely declined to give engin-! curing advice or express an opinion i as to the merits or demerits of the i rival harbour proposals before the people. His visit was the direct ; outcome of the Harbour League’s campaign. The people were given the promise that the League’s can-; didates would pledge themselves to . have a thorough investigation made : of the harbour question and Mr. Ferguson has given us his experi-; enced advice as to how this work! should be undertaken. But so far as the inner harbour advocates are concerned there is no wavering in , belief that Mr. Nelson’s proposals' should be carried through. On the other hand there is no desire to force public opinion. The League ; has been open and straightforward i
with the people and the policy of investigation now being followed will abundantly indicate their action. It is positively absurd to hold that because- Air. Ferguson suggests dredging of the channel that he supports the “three engineers” in their objection to the inner harbour. He merely accepted this as an objection raised and suggests a’dredging test as the best way to remove all doubt. His other advice also goes to show the Board the best method of procedure, but certainly in no way whatever does he detract from the merits of the inner harbour scheme. On the contrary, we find that in his reply to Air. Niven as to the design of the breakwater harbour he left little doubt in the minds of his audience that the accommodation proposed was not adequate for the big ocean liners which it is hoped would visit the port. However,, we do not wish to raise a critical attitude, but merely so far as is possible to coun- ; teract any misrepresentation of the , position.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HBTRIB19110721.2.36
Bibliographic details
Hawke's Bay Tribune, Volume I, Issue 184, 21 July 1911, Page 4
Word Count
378THE ENGINEER’S ADVICE. Hawke's Bay Tribune, Volume I, Issue 184, 21 July 1911, Page 4
Using This Item
NZME is the copyright owner for the Hawke's Bay Tribune. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of NZME. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.