Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

INCOME-TAX DISPUTE

CHALLENGE OF ASSESSMENT APPEAL, VERDICT RESERVED (By Telegraph—Press Associaiion.) WMjLINGTON, Sept. 27. The Appeal Court reserved its decision in the appeal by T Bryant and May and Bell and Company Ltd. versus the Commissioner of Taxes, concerning assessment of income tax. Mr James, second counsel for the appellant, submitted that “capital” in taxing statements meant fixed and not circulating capital, and “interest’.’ not deductible from assessable income meant interest on circulating capital Would lead to consequences so unjust that it would be impossible to suppose that the legislature intended it so to be read. The Solicitor-General, for the Commissioner of Taxes, was not called upon.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HAWST19330928.2.36

Bibliographic details

Hawera Star, Volume LIII, 28 September 1933, Page 5

Word Count
107

INCOME-TAX DISPUTE Hawera Star, Volume LIII, 28 September 1933, Page 5

INCOME-TAX DISPUTE Hawera Star, Volume LIII, 28 September 1933, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert