Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

ALLEGED CONSPIRACY.

THE HOBBS CASE,

BY CABLE—PRESS ASSOCIATION—COPYRIGHT. LONDON. March 4. In the Hobbs case, the judge’s ruling that a letter from Sir Hari Singh’s secretary was inadmissible led to Sir E. Curtis Bennett protesting that Hobbs was suffering because Sir Hari Singh and his secretary were not called as witnesses. The judge ret torted that nobody suffered, because the rules of- evidence were propei-jv observed.

Newton gave evidence that Captain Arthur* bought Newton’s .share in the second cheque for 650, CKK) francs. Arthur subsequently sued Newton for £17,300, but the -action was settled by consent on payment of £IOOO. Newton denied that Arthur paid him 20,000 francs in connection with Mrs. Schmidt, whom Arthur was taking to India as his wife. The case was adjourned.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HAWST19250306.2.38

Bibliographic details

Hawera Star, Volume XLVIII, 6 March 1925, Page 5

Word Count
126

ALLEGED CONSPIRACY. Hawera Star, Volume XLVIII, 6 March 1925, Page 5

ALLEGED CONSPIRACY. Hawera Star, Volume XLVIII, 6 March 1925, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert