Hastings S.M. Court.
At the S.M. Court to-day, before A. Turnbull, Esq., S.M., the following cases were dealt with : Moore and Vance v. P. Palmer, claim £7 10s ; judgment by default. Henry Connop v. Jubal Fleming, claim £3 3s ; plaintiff non-suited with costs. David A. Wright v. Percy A. Herman, claim £3 10s; judgment by default, costs 10s. S. Ridgway v. Mere Haki, claim, £5 18s 6d; judgment by default, costs 12s. E. H. Williams v. D. B. Young, claim £8 10s 6d ; judgment by default, costs Bs. Brathwaite and Tipping v. John Scott, claim £l9 16s; judgment by default; costs 10s. W. R. Blythe v. Fred List, claim £2 10s; judgment by default, costs 10s. E. Collins and A. Sinclair v. Thomas Sinclair, claim £2O ; plaintiff non-suited without costs. JUDGMENT SUMMONSES. W. B. Benson v. Te Whare, claim £1 16s lid; amount to be paid forthwith or in default four days in gaol. W. A. Beecroft v. Percy Flaxmore, claim £l7 15s; amount to be paid forthwith or in default three weeks in gaol. Win. J. Wells v. W. H. Jones, claim £1 ; to be paid forthwith or in default four days in gaol. G. H. Yickers v. Fred List, claim £1 lis 6d; to be paid forthwith or four days in gaol.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HAST18970611.2.8
Bibliographic details
Hastings Standard, Issue 345, 11 June 1897, Page 2
Word Count
214Hastings S.M. Court. Hastings Standard, Issue 345, 11 June 1897, Page 2
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in