Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

An Important Decision by the S.M.

In the case Loughnan and others v. Hatton —an action for recovery of rent under an agreement to lease —Mr Turnbull, S.M., gave judgment this day. Mr A, J. "White appeared for the plaintiffs and Mr A. C. Lewis for defendant. The question for decision was whether an agreement to lease for more than a year took effect as a lease or whether it operated as a tenancy, determinable on a month's notice in writing. Mr White quoted cases in support of contention that agreement to lease took effect as a lease and the S.M. upheld the decision and gave judgment for plaintiffs for £36 5s ; costs 80s, and solicitor's fee, ±'2 2s.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HAST18961218.2.9

Bibliographic details

Hastings Standard, Issue 200, 18 December 1896, Page 2

Word Count
119

An Important Decision by the S.M. Hastings Standard, Issue 200, 18 December 1896, Page 2

An Important Decision by the S.M. Hastings Standard, Issue 200, 18 December 1896, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert