Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SENSATIONAL WILL CASE.

A CLEAR CASE OF FRAUD.

Melbourne, This day. A disputed will case which came before the Court had a jfcfeHsational evidence. *

The will was alleged to be a forgery by counsel for the eaveatrix, who sprung a surprise on the propounders of the will, A witness named Cameron was busily denying the statement that he approached various persons with an instruction to forge the wiH, when counsel produced the actual persons who drew up the document. Cameron then confessed that the will was a forgery, and was committed for trial on a charge of perjury, and, with another witness, was farther committed on a charge of conspiracy to utter a forged wili,

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/HAST18960919.2.13.6

Bibliographic details

Hastings Standard, Issue 125, 19 September 1896, Page 2

Word Count
115

SENSATIONAL WILL CASE. Hastings Standard, Issue 125, 19 September 1896, Page 2

SENSATIONAL WILL CASE. Hastings Standard, Issue 125, 19 September 1896, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert