Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

The Footbridge.

[TO THE EDITOR.] Sir, —Mr Sandlant says I am all wrong, and is cruel enough to bint that I have been blown off into space by that same potency whose magnetic influence has operated upon the Mayor with such a silent force that hia inner consciousness has come within the radius and resulted in hia subsidence. To take up arms against Mr Sandlant is like trying to use a crowbar to force over a big boulder—you are in danger of having the whole structure toppling back and crushing right down upon you, but you may have a chance by keeping cool, and not being dismayed by the ponderous projection of big words. I must apologise to him for having misunderstood the position he takes up in the matter. If all are agreed that there shall be a fair contribution all round, then let it be hands across at once—and money planked down. Nothing more is wanted. But I am suspicious Mr Sandlant is the exception, not the rule, on the other side. I am afraid his legal opinion would be dear even at the small price of nothing if it were acted upon. Without Mr Sandlant's direct disclaimer, I do not see how bis own words about a mandamus could be construed into anything else but a threat—he put it plainly enough that if what he wants done la not done, they will resort to extreme action. I again repeat that if Mr Sandlant’a own writings are intended to be taken seriously, either the Mayor acted in a way quite unbefitting his position, or the Councillors acted in a most boorish manner. I am glad that It is denied that any such inference was intended, but the talk about a glamor of consequence comes with bad grace from one making such denial. However, Ido not want to concern myself as the champion of anyone—the Mayor, I assume, wants no champion, and members of the Press are usually well able to take care of themselves. All I wish to do is to give a friendly warning of a possible future development. I do not think I need even give the Editor a pat of butter, and I certainly would not admit that he is willing to give fairplay if I were also to accuse him of publishing reports that are the outcome of toadyism.—l am, etc., Borough.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GSCCG18910214.2.16

Bibliographic details

Gisborne Standard and Cook County Gazette, Volume IV, Issue 570, 14 February 1891, Page 2

Word Count
398

The Footbridge. Gisborne Standard and Cook County Gazette, Volume IV, Issue 570, 14 February 1891, Page 2

The Footbridge. Gisborne Standard and Cook County Gazette, Volume IV, Issue 570, 14 February 1891, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert