Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

BROKEN BEER BOTTLES

LEADS TO COURT CASE. A STILLWATER MISHAP. He who would not come in contact with the law among other things must not throw bottles, no matter what they contain, nor no matter in what spirit the bottle is thrown at a train, for it is an offence. Thomas Hartigan Rogers on the 14th day of February, 1928, was in his car at Stillwater when the Otira train came in. The day was hot, exceedingly so, and in a spirit of benevolence, and no doubt with a knowledge of the pangs of thirst ho threw a bottle of beer to a friend who was standing on one of the carriage platforms. Either the pass was bad, or badly accepted and the bottle was shattered on the platform. The loss of the liquid would in itself appear to bo misfortune enough, but evidently it was not Thomas Hartigan’s lucky day, for the eagle eye of E. A. Le Fevre, a railway employee who was on duty at the time, saw the inedient, with the result that a charge was laid against Rogers, the hearing of which came up before Mr W. Meldrum, S.M. at the Magistrate’s Court. Some slight hitch arose at first as to the date of the offence, but it was finally decided that February 14 was the day. The defendant did not appear. E. A. Le Fevre gave evidence that he was on duty on the day in question and he saw defendant throw the bottle to some one on the train. The bottle did not reach the hands of the man standing on the carriage platform, with the result that it dropped on to the platform and broke. A copy of the rgulations dealing with this offence was handed to the S.M. who remarked smilingly that “the bottle was thrown for a mate to catch and was not thrown at the train, which appeared to be a different thing.’’ Defendant was fined 5/- with costs amount ing to £l.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GRA19280327.2.4

Bibliographic details

Grey River Argus, 27 March 1928, Page 2

Word Count
334

BROKEN BEER BOTTLES Grey River Argus, 27 March 1928, Page 2

BROKEN BEER BOTTLES Grey River Argus, 27 March 1928, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert