CORRESPONDENCE
NON.PAKT?" P()LITICS. (To the Editor). Dear Sir, —“Veritas A'incit” in his letter of the 11th inst, a reply to I’. Higgins of the t»lh. that appeared in the Argus, says: “for prolixity it is hard to beat, but 1 must confess Iha I 1 cannot get exactly what he ‘is driving- at.” Usually, when a hook or a letter, etc, becomes (prolixity) long am! tedious and a. bore to read, one will not create enough interest to read ol), lei alone go to the bother of writing about it. riierefore, the word prolixity used by “A’eritas Vincit” is a contradiction to his action. Where he says: “I must confess I do not know-- what he is driving at,” is another contradiction, because he emphatically criticises and condemns the drixer and the very essence of what was driven at. Therefore, under such circumstances, there is no further need of an attempt to make clear what “Veritas Vincit” confesses he cannot understand. I am etc., INTERESTED.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GRA19250627.2.43
Bibliographic details
Grey River Argus, 27 June 1925, Page 7
Word Count
165CORRESPONDENCE Grey River Argus, 27 June 1925, Page 7
Using This Item
Copyright undetermined – untraced rights owner. For advice on reproduction of material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in