APPEAL COURT
KING V. HALL AND CASSIDY
, Bee 20. In the case King v Hal] a.ul Cassidy and A. Hall Ltd., the Appeal Court gave Judgement for pl&iiitift against Hall and Cassidy for the amount of' the verdict in the Lower Court, and costs as on appeal on the Ingest scale as'from a- distance, costs in the Supreme Court to be ascertained a.id adjusted at Christchurch. Mr Martin moved for conditional leave to appetvl to the Privy Council and this was granted on the usual security being given. He also moved for judgement in favour of Hall Limited. This was granted with costs to bo.aseertiviued a.id adjusted^" Chiistchiiich.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GRA19201221.2.81
Bibliographic details
Grey River Argus, 21 December 1920, Page 6
Word Count
108APPEAL COURT Grey River Argus, 21 December 1920, Page 6
Using This Item
Copyright undetermined – untraced rights owner. For advice on reproduction of material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in