Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

NO TAIL LIGHT.

MOTOR CYCLIST IN TROUBLE. (Preßs Assooia-tion.J PALMERSTON N., Oct. 29. “Not guilty” pleaded a motor cyclist in the Magistrate’s Court today when charged with having no tail light on his motor cycle. “I had a red reflector, and thought it as good as a tail light,” he added. The Magistrate.: You might, but others think it rotten. A red reflector is no excuse for not having a tail light. . Defendant: I thought it was. The Magistrate: Why should it ? It seems we are going to get this excuse a lot, but I must insist on motorists having i tail lights. . These red reilectors are only an additional expense to motorists. I don’t know how I would! look upon a charge of having no red reflector, hut' so long as the tail light was going I would probably throw it out.”

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GIST19281030.2.40

Bibliographic details

Gisborne Times, Volume LXVIII, Issue 10730, 30 October 1928, Page 5

Word Count
143

NO TAIL LIGHT. Gisborne Times, Volume LXVIII, Issue 10730, 30 October 1928, Page 5

NO TAIL LIGHT. Gisborne Times, Volume LXVIII, Issue 10730, 30 October 1928, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert