DREW’S ACQUITTAL
THEATRICALISM DOMINANT USE OF ADVERSITY (Australian Press Association.) (By Cable—Press Assn. —Copyright.) LONDON, October 10. Drew’s leonine presence, appearance and melodramatic methods dominated the Reading tragedy inquest to the end. The Coroner, in summing up, detailed the testimony of the sixty witnesses, the evidence of the greater number of whom concerned Drew’s whereabouts in the fatal ten minutes (between the absence of the deceased’s wife from his shop and her return to find him dead). When the jury returned, the famous blue suit and other exhibits were taken to the retiring room, and also a book entitled “A Day from London to Penzance,” which the deceased, Oliver, was reading when he was struck down. There was a hush, in the crowded court when the foreman began to read the verdict, butthecloing words “Persons unknown,” resulted in an amazing scene. Women rose in the court and waved their handkerchiefs. Men threw their hats in the air, cheering. Drew was occupied in consoling Mrs. Lindo, who wept with relief on hearing the verdict. When Drew appeared'with his counsel, Mr. Whittingstall, in the streets, the ovation was repeated. A crowd outside greeted the actor with cheers and a storm of hand clapping, while Drew, surrounded by a dozen constables, made his way to his hotel. Drew was finally carried shoulder high, and the police had to fight a way for Drew and his party, until they reached the hotel.
Drew then went on to the balcony, and threw kisses to the crowd below. At last, Drew stretched out his hands, and signalled for silence. He said: “Just a moment, before you go to your homes. I want to thank you for the prayers that you sent up on my behalf. I .shall never forget this demonstration of glorious sympathy you extended. Moreover, I shall never forget the wonderful courtesy that the glorious Press has unanimously accorded me. Good afternoon to you all!”
Interviewed later, he said: “I feel deeply that the system of Coroner’s inquiry is wrong—not exactly the “third degree” or “crucifixion,” but a terrible ordeal. My conscience is satisfied absolutely. I have shirked nothing. What more should I do? I sincerely trust that the man who killed Oliver will be found, sooner or later —not for my personal satisfaction, but in the interests of justice, and also to confute the few doubting Thomases who may still exist. Any of these who have seen me go through the ordeal must realise that I have held up my head from first to last. I had no reason why I should not.”
Mr. Lindo says that he is opening “The Monster” Coy. in the West End of London in a fortnightw, with Drew, his wife, and himself in their old parts.
Mrs. Lindo’ final analysis of the situation is summed up thus: “To me, men, especially actors, are helpless creatures.” She added: “The evidence showed Drew to be the big baby he
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GEST19291012.2.47
Bibliographic details
Greymouth Evening Star, 12 October 1929, Page 7
Word Count
490DREW’S ACQUITTAL Greymouth Evening Star, 12 October 1929, Page 7
Using This Item
The Greymouth Evening Star Co Ltd is the copyright owner for the Greymouth Evening Star. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of the Greymouth Evening Star Co Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.