Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

DOCTOR ACQUITTED

NO EVIDENCE FOR JURY. (Per Press Association.) WELLINGTON, September 16. Magistrate Page, in a reserved judgment, dismissed the case against Dr. Jacobson, of inciting a young woman to permit the use of an instrument or other unlawful means to procure certain results. He quoted authorities to show that an accused person could not be convicted of such an offence unless the crime incited to be committed had actually taken place. The crime alleged to have been incited had not been committed. There was no doubt that the conduct of accused in giving an address had resulted in the girl going to the woman, but he could not be charged with aiding or abetting.. He found no evidence of persuasiofr or dissuasion, and there was no evidence to go to a jury on the charge of inciting.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GEST19260916.2.13

Bibliographic details

Greymouth Evening Star, 16 September 1926, Page 2

Word Count
138

DOCTOR ACQUITTED Greymouth Evening Star, 16 September 1926, Page 2

DOCTOR ACQUITTED Greymouth Evening Star, 16 September 1926, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert