Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

ELECTION BET.

JUDGMENT FOR PLAINTIFF. MAGISTRATE'S COMMENT. Association.) STRATFORD, This Day. Mr. Bailey, S.M., delivered judgment to-day in the wagering case, Morrison versus Sharp, in which a claim was made against Sharp as the stakeholder of a bet on the election. The plaintiff alleged that the money was paid away by Sharp contrary to his instructions. At the hearing a fortnight ago h. non-suit was applied for on the ground that no action could be,* thus relying on Section 70 of the Gaming Act. In his concluding judgment the Magistrate, said: "The addition of the words over and above those continued in the English Act appear to me to have no effect on the law, as it stood belore the passing of our 1894 Act. Judgment was_ given for the plaintiff for the amount claimed, with costs. Secumy for an appeal was fixed at £7O.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/GEST19200813.2.14

Bibliographic details

Greymouth Evening Star, 13 August 1920, Page 2

Word Count
145

ELECTION BET. Greymouth Evening Star, 13 August 1920, Page 2

ELECTION BET. Greymouth Evening Star, 13 August 1920, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert