Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

ATOMIC ENERGY

RETENTION OF SECRET BY AMERICA VIGOROUS ATTACK ON PROPOSAL WOULD LEAD TO SUSPICION AND FEAR WASffINGTON, October 19. The Administration's Bill for the nationalising of atomic energy came under vigorous attack from a group of scientists who were ""closely associated with the developing of the atomic •bomb, says the ' New York Times' correspondent. The Bill's chances of; passage in its present form have beeo. materially lessened! The critics denounced the Bill as . tending to " freeze " rather than promote scientific experimenta- - tion, and as being nationalistic, justifying other countries in taking an attitude of suspicion and fear of the United States. Dr Harold Urey, one of the pioneers of the atomic bomb, with the approval of four colleagues, said the Bill would create a potential dictator of science, and would server notice upon the world that the United States was opening an armaments race. Dr H. J. Curtis, another atomic developer, said: " The whole tone of the Bill is such that if I were a scientist of some other country I would assuredly think that the United States was getting ready to bomb us ; in a big way. Any foreign country is going to read into the Bill that we are essentially an aggressor nation." General H. H. Arnold, Commander-in-Chief of the United States Army Air Forces, told a Senate sub-commit-tee that at the present stage, of development the only defence against the atomic bomb was to stop it before it started out. "It is possible now to take an atomic bomb and fit it with wings and also a television head, making it a guided missile. The only way to ' launch it over 300 miles from the target is bv aircraft;" he said. I do not think we have- anything at present to prevent such a missile com- . ing against a taTget while it is beyond the range of anti-aircraft guns. - :

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD19451020.2.72

Bibliographic details

Evening Star, Issue 25619, 20 October 1945, Page 7

Word Count
313

ATOMIC ENERGY Evening Star, Issue 25619, 20 October 1945, Page 7

ATOMIC ENERGY Evening Star, Issue 25619, 20 October 1945, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert