Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CONDEMNED UNHEARD

INDUSTRY AND THE BUREAU MR MANDER REITERATES COMPLAINT [Pia United Press Association.] WELLINGTON, April 9. Mr A. C. Mander, replying to Mr Sullivan’s statement, says: “I made criticism of the practice of Ministers and the Bureau of Industry making decisions largely on the strength of secret reports prepared by departmental omcers, without the reports being shown at least to the party reported upon. It is disappointing to find that Mr Sullivan does not give any indication that he has seen the point of my argument. The Minister’s statement regarding the integrity and ability of his departmental officers is _ undoubtedly well meant, but quite beside the point. Presumably the integrity of public servants is equal to that of the legal profession, the business community, or any other representative body of New Zealanders. That is generally good, but weak in some cases. “ In my statement I expressly refrained from raising the question of the ability of departmental officers to make reliable reports on the efficiency or management of business. The question was whether the report should be a secret one or whether it ought not to be disclosed to the firm reported upon. I was not referring to the conclusions arrived at. the decision made, or the judgment passed upon the industry. I was referring to the report upon which such conclusion or judgment was based. “If the Government or the bureau, largely on the strength of a secret departmental report, makes a decision adverse to a particular industry or firm, the fact is that the industry has been condemned on evidence which it has not seen and has not been given the opp?-ity to correct or deny. “ I do not wish to get at cross purposes with the Minister, who, I know, is honestly trying to do his best for the manufacturing industry. I only suggest that he might consider whether the Government cannot eliminate a system of judging and condemning firms and industries largely on the strength of reports not disclosed to them.’l

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD19370409.2.57

Bibliographic details

Evening Star, Issue 22618, 9 April 1937, Page 8

Word Count
335

CONDEMNED UNHEARD Evening Star, Issue 22618, 9 April 1937, Page 8

CONDEMNED UNHEARD Evening Star, Issue 22618, 9 April 1937, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert