Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

MUNICIPAL MILK SCHEME

TO THE EDITOR. Sir, —It has surprised me that there has appeared no expression of public opinion on the proposal of the City Council to take on the role of milk vendor in Dunedin. Surely there are more pressing matters of health, which come more justly within the municipal duties. Greater cleanliness in the streets and byways and the erection of a destructor are pressing needs for public hygiene, as also the clearance of rubbish. It is futile and childish to argue that because the cities of Auckland and Wellington have a municipal" milk scheme therefore Dunedin should follow. The conditions are totally different. Dunedin is quite a small town; the milk supply is excellent in quality and adequate to the needs of our population. Dairy farms are on the very outskirts of the town—not more than two or three miles distant. Milk comes direct from the milking sheds to the individual householder, in time for the school children’s breakfast, and the. price is reasonable. Dunedin housewives are capable of judging the quality. _ There is the choice of many dairies, having the highest reputation, and surely the women have the gumption, the courage, the common sense to choose the best supply of good milk. Inspectors serve to keep up the standard. All these advantages are lost when the city takes over the milk runs.

Good is mixed with indifferent qualities. Milk delivered to the municipal centre, treated before the distribution, must be at least 12 hours old before the children get it. Inspectors will not have a free hand over the vans delivering milk, and certainly the price will go up and remain up. The ratepayer will be burdened with increasing expense, as well as the initial cost of, £6,000. There was no mandate given to the councillors at the election. I cannot recall any mention of the milk scheme in any important speech; the matter should, stand over till next election for the consideration of the ratepayers. Let me say that I am in no way connected with the dairying industry, nor ever have been. As a consumer I have had very varied • experience, ranging from a pastoral county in England to the large industrial cities of the north-—cities with a population of over a million—where the atmosphere is vitiated with the smoko of ironworks, etc.; also London, with its 7,000,000 inhabitants. But in this small town, free from polluted air, we do not need to take on the financial burden of a municipal milk scheme. I hope that the project will not be pushed through.—l am, etc., Woman Ratepayer. February 16.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD19370216.2.41.4

Bibliographic details

Evening Star, Issue 22574, 16 February 1937, Page 7

Word Count
436

MUNICIPAL MILK SCHEME Evening Star, Issue 22574, 16 February 1937, Page 7

MUNICIPAL MILK SCHEME Evening Star, Issue 22574, 16 February 1937, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert