EXTRADITION PROCEEDINGS
, ■ .®’ . "" . . , THE SHARE SCRIP CASE .-—. ■ ■ « [Per United Press Association.] WELLINGTON, May 17. The decision of Mr J. H. Lnxford, S.M., that' the depositions taken in Sydney against William Campbell and Madge Mnnro were admissible as evidence for the purposes of extradition' was challenged in the Supreme Court when H. E. Harding and Mr Cl. H. Arndt, acting on behalf of Mnnro, applied before Mr Justice Blair for a writ of prohibition.' Campbell and Mnnro are charged with the theft of share scrip .in Sydney, and the police arc seeking their extradition to New South Wales. The admissibility of the depositions was challenged on the ground that the magistrate in Sydney refused to allow a legal representative of the defendant the right of audience at the taking of the depositions. . Tim writ was refused,' Mr- Justice Blair saying that the magistrate’s altitude Avas correct. 7
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD19350518.2.171
Bibliographic details
Evening Star, Issue 22032, 18 May 1935, Page 26
Word Count
145EXTRADITION PROCEEDINGS Evening Star, Issue 22032, 18 May 1935, Page 26
Using This Item
Allied Press Ltd is the copyright owner for the Evening Star. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons New Zealand BY-NC-SA licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Allied Press Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.