Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

BUDGET DEBATE

MR LLOYD GEORGE'S ATTACK “ MR DEFICIT " Prew Association—By Telegraph—Copyright LONDON, April 13, (Received April 14, at 11.30 a.m.) Resuming the Budget debate in the House of Commons, Sir Robert Horne (Con.) said Labor was disappointed because it had not found a miserable Chancellor in a whit© sheet. He sympathised with; Labor and congratulated Mr Churchill on his series of clever contrivances by means of which ho had succeeded in climbing the precipice. At the same time a burden of £.874,000,000 was an impossible one for the country to boar, and no one could look to the future with any hope if that figure were to become the normal expenditure. Mr Lloyd George said he was disappointed with Sir Robert Horne’s speech. Mr Churchill stood in danger of going down in history as “Mr Deficit.” There was no apparent provision to meet the expenditure in connection with China. It was a great mistake not to Budget in anticipation, as the troops would remain in China for some time. The new taxes were feeble, miserable, and annoying. £30,000,000 had been described as being made up of windfalls, hut they wore tree shakings, not windfalls. There were one or two apples not ripe. Anyhow they had not come out of Mr Churchill’s orchard. Mr Churchill apparently believed with Robert Louis Stevenson that it was better to travel hopefully than to arrive. He had aimed at economy, but the sturdy figure of the First Lord of the Admiralty stood in front of the target, causing him tb miss bis mm. The abolition of tho three departments was a first-class mistake. Real economy lay in the direction of armaments. A Minister was sent to Geneva to ask others to reduce armaments while Britain was increasing its Navy. Britain was accused of hypocrisy, and there was a certain element of truth in that charge. Britain was confronting the nations which were without Britain's burdens; hence the Budget was misleading, irrelevant, and unhelpful.

THE STOCK EXCHANGE. LONDON, April 13. On the Stock Exchange tho Budget proposals, especially the increase in tho Sinking Funds, are reflected in a general advance of prices, especially in giltedged stocks, and also in home rails and industrial shares.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD19270414.2.66

Bibliographic details

Evening Star, Issue 19533, 14 April 1927, Page 6

Word Count
368

BUDGET DEBATE Evening Star, Issue 19533, 14 April 1927, Page 6

BUDGET DEBATE Evening Star, Issue 19533, 14 April 1927, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert