Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

MAGISTRATE’S COURT

, j Tnun.smw, Alav 25. '■ (iiotoro .Mr J. J!. Hart holoinew, S.AI.) BY D.E FACET. •Judgment, vriib coat s, v, as given for I'ianmiir in Iho following undefended ] '■as.v.: As l iomil Alorig.-igi*, ami Agency Company v. X. Fletcher (Fopotimoa), El I (is Si 1, lor sheep-dip supplied ; A. am! T. Jill ti , 1. CI). v. A. 11. All-Kill | ' Invercargill,), i's 2s, loj- hardwood j supplied and infere, 1 ; .Mark Faigan v. j Wiiliam (dlland (.Miller’s Flat), £5 18s j lid, ior motor repairs and goods sun-i | plied; same v. Charles LilJand (A)il-1 j lerhs flat), £l Ids for motor repairs! |aml goods supplied -, same v. Thomas I I I land (Fori Craig). £5 J 1 s, ior ear | j hires ; Reid ami Cray, Lid.. v, ,).l | Diiekin.inUui (Fortohello). id JBs .‘id,! | lor .repairs to plough ami freight. | j CLAIMS I-Off FUWMXSIOX. i j .Maria Smith (Mr Aloore) claimed ire.m Charles Watkins (.Mr T. O'Shea) possession of a house, .\ O . Hi Duncan si fee I, let by the plailltilf to (In; defendant at a weekly rental of .‘(Os per week, FlainliJf also sought 1o recover from (he defendant the sum of £5 as rent duo.—Air O’Shea said that his eliciit did not dispute possession, but thought that the rem was unduly high.—Sifter hearing the evidence the Magistrate gave judgment for rent claimed (ho), based on 251 per week, with costs (£2 ]>), and made au order for possession on or before Juno 22. Henry Huston (Air 11. Laron) claimed from Charles U. Viney (Air .lirasch) the possesion of a house, Xo. ood Leith street, and also the sum of C2U, being twenty-six weeks rent up to .May 24 at £1 per week.—-The defence wm.s that there was no evidence of a 1 weekly tenancy, and the notice given • j was not a good notice to quit. Mr - Brasch submitted that there was, therefore, no case.—The Magistrate took the same view with regard to ) Micro being no evidence of a weekly ‘ tenancy, and judgment was given for i , | rent claimed, loss two weeks (£24), ; with costs (£2 10s), and the order for 11 j possession refused. ) ===== j

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD19220525.2.4

Bibliographic details

Evening Star, Issue 17977, 25 May 1922, Page 1

Word Count
356

MAGISTRATE’S COURT Evening Star, Issue 17977, 25 May 1922, Page 1

MAGISTRATE’S COURT Evening Star, Issue 17977, 25 May 1922, Page 1

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert