Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

ARBITRATION COURT

ITitu Ukitkd Tbjsss Association.]

CHRISTCHURCH, September 21. The union representative mentioned in. connection with the painters’ dispute that two of tile employers assessors bad agreed to a point in the Conciliation Council, but another assessor, stood out. -The President (Mr Justice Stringer) said that in future he dnl 11.;t wait reference made lo the Conciliation Council in tho Court, The conui-il was a place for freedom of speech, and all proceedings there were without prejudice, lie uid not wish any mention of tlm«v proceedings made in tlie Arbitration Court, ibe Court heard the painters’ dispute and reserved decision.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD19160921.2.59

Bibliographic details

Evening Star, Issue 16225, 21 September 1916, Page 6

Word Count
100

ARBITRATION COURT Evening Star, Issue 16225, 21 September 1916, Page 6

ARBITRATION COURT Evening Star, Issue 16225, 21 September 1916, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert