Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

STATE COAL.

. _ TO THE EDITOa. Sir,—Seeing that you Were unable to I answer the query put to you by "F.X." in your issue of Saturday re State Coal* I might be permitted to reply. You* correspondent is arcritmß to know 'why State coal m 5$ per ton higher in Dunedin than in Christchurch, notwithstanding the transhipment and railway tunnel charges nt Lyttelton. In the first place, the State Coal Mines Department do not pay harbor dues,, transhipment, and tunnel charges; and. secondly, Dunedin importers of State coal pay. 3s per ton harbor dues, la per ton more freight, Is per ton cartage from wharf to yard. Urns it is easily seen bow. the cost to the consumer in Dunedin is 5s per ton more than in Christeirtfcn. Further comment is unnecessary.--I am,, etc., _ V •. ' ~ Wao Kxows. '. SeotembeT'24.. : '

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/ESD19060925.2.7.2

Bibliographic details

Evening Star, Issue 12927, 25 September 1906, Page 2

Word Count
137

STATE COAL. Evening Star, Issue 12927, 25 September 1906, Page 2

STATE COAL. Evening Star, Issue 12927, 25 September 1906, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert