INDUSTRIAL LAW
AMENDING BILL
PROTECTIVE CLAUSES
Protection for employees against dismissal or altering of their positions adversely because of their having taken part in industrial union activities is given in a clause of the Industrial Conciliation and Arbitration Amendment Bill, introduced in the House of Representatives last night. The clause provides that where any employer dismisses any worker or alters any worker's position in the employment to his prejudice, and at any time within twelve months before the dismissal or alteration of position the worker (a) was an officer of a union or branch or a member of the committee of management or held any other official office, or (b) had acted as an assessor on a conciliation council, or (c) had represented a union or branch in any negotiations or conference between employers and workers, or (c) was entitled to or claimed for himself or any other worker some benefit of an award, order, or agreement, the employer shall be liable to a penalty. It is made a defence, however, to the employer if he proves that the worker was dismissed or that his position was altered for other reasons.
Referring to this clause, the Minister of Labour (Mr. Webb) said he did not think there was any case on record where there, had been any serious trouble in respect to such treatment of workers by employers, but it was considered advisable that there should be provision for such a contingency.
Another clause renders employees who refuse to join a union liable to a penalty not exceeding £5. At present the employer only is liable.
RECOVERY OF MONEY.
The final clause in the Bill deals with the recovery of money due to workers under awards and industrial agreements. Without affecting.. any other remedies for the recovery of money payable by an employer under any award or industrial agreement, the clause provides that where any payment has been made at a rate lower than that fixed by the award or agreement, the balance of the money may be recovered , for the worker in the same manner as. a penalty for a breach of an.award or agreement, notwithstanding the acceptance by the worker of payment at a lower rate or any expressed or implied agreement to the contrary. A claim under this section against an employer may be joined in the same action with a claim against the same employer for a penalty for a breach of the award or agreement.
The Minister said that the clause arose from the case of Wilson v. Dalgety, and Harbour Board cases where the employers had not paid overtime rates for Sunday and holiday work in accordance with decisions of the Arbitration Court, but had endeavoured to have civil action taken for recovery in order that they might obtain a Supreme Court decision, apparently anticipating that the Supreme Court would give a decision contrary to that given by the Court of Arbitration.
The Bill was read a second time pro forma and referred to the Labour Bills Committee.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19430721.2.44
Bibliographic details
Evening Post, Volume CXXXVI, Issue 18, 21 July 1943, Page 4
Word Count
504INDUSTRIAL LAW Evening Post, Volume CXXXVI, Issue 18, 21 July 1943, Page 4
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Evening Post. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.