Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

OATH OF LOYALTY

(To the Editor.)

Sir,—Your correspondent, J. H. McKenzie, in Friday's issue, refers to "anyone who knows the full purport of the affirmation of loyalty that State servants make." Your correspondent is evidently under .a misapprehension. Every public servant on joining is, required, and quite properly, to make a declaration of secrecy, but is not required to take an oath of affirmation of allegiance. Why should he? Every citizen, be he a public servant or otherwise, owes allegiance to the Crown, and it would be quite illogical —indeed unfair—to require a special oath of allegiance to be taken by one particular section of the community, especially a section whose record of loyalty and service is second to none. —I am, etc.,

RETURNED SOLDIER,

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19411008.2.39.6

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Volume CXXXII, Issue 86, 8 October 1941, Page 6

Word Count
125

OATH OF LOYALTY Evening Post, Volume CXXXII, Issue 86, 8 October 1941, Page 6

OATH OF LOYALTY Evening Post, Volume CXXXII, Issue 86, 8 October 1941, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert