Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

LAWN TENNIS

RANKING MATCHES

THE COMPLETE DRAW

The following is the complete draw for the Wellington Lawn Tennis Association's ranking matches, which will begin -this weekend:— FIRST SUNDAY (NOVEMBER 24). Men. No. 1 Group.—"A": France v. Rous- ' sell; Bedford v. Ferkins; Smith v Roussell; France v. Bedford; Ferkins v. Smith. "B": Coombe v. Lyons; Charters v. Dyer; Pearce v. LyonsCharters v. Coombe; Dyer v. Pearce. No. 2 Group.—"A": Latham v. Gosnell; J. McCarthy v. Livingstone; Murray v. Gosnell; J. McCarthy v. LathamLivingstone v. Murray. "B": Morrison v. Marchant; B. McCarthy v. Scotland; Joblin v. Marchant; B. McCarthy v Morrison; Scotland v. Joblin. No. 3 Group.—"A" Pollock v. Dixon; Edwards v. Pointon; Buckmaster v Dixon; Edwards v. Pollock; Pointon V. Buckmaster. "B": Reeves v. Bundle; .Blyth v. Long; Plank v. Bundle; Blyth. v. Reeves; Long v. Plank. No. 4 Group.—"A": Liddle v. Driscoll; Watty. Glenn; Gallagher v. Driscoll; Watt v; Liddle; Glenn v. Gallagher. "B" Withers v. Chick; Kelly v. Hickmott; Davis v. Chick; Kelly v. Withers; Hickmott v. Davis. "C"Longmore v. Griffiths; Calcinai v. Clark; Lawton v. Griffiths; Longmore v. Calcinai; Clark v. Lawton. "D": Sissons v. Doe; Jones v. LangdonBrand v. Doe; Jones v. Sissons; Langdon v. Brand. FIRST SATURDAY (NOVEMBER 30). Women. No. 1 Group.—Miss Fernie v. Miss Howe; Mrs. Dickson v. Mrs. TurnbullMiss Fernie v. Mrs. Dickson; Miss Howe v. Mrs. Turnbull. No. 2 Group.—Mrs. Latham v. Miss Macassey; Mrs. Joblin v. Mrs. FranceMiss Whisker v. Miss Macassey; Mrs. Joblin v. Mrs. Latham; Mrs. France v. Miss Whisker. FIRST SUNDAY (NOVEMBER 24). No. 3 Group.—Miss Shiel v. Miss Heard; Miss Small v. Miss Williams; Miss Heard v. Miss Maslen; Miss Small v. Miss Shiel; Miss Williams, v Miss Maslen. No. 4 Group.—Miss Everton v. Miss Forrester; Miss Warsaw v. Miss Sinclair; Miss Carson v. Miss ForresterMiss Warsaw v. Miss Everton; Miss Sinclair v. Miss Carson. No. 5 Group.—Miss McCaul v. Miss Grainger; Miss Rendle v. Miss McCaul- • Miss Grainger v. Miss Rendle. SECOND DAY (DECEMBER 14). Women. No. 1 Group.—Miss Fernie v. Mrs . Turnbull; Miss Howe v. Mrs/ Dickson. ; No. 2 Group.—Mrs. France v. Mrs. Latham; Mrs. Joblin v. Miss WhiskerMrs. France v. Miss Macassey; Mrs Latham v. Miss Whisker; Mrs. Joblin v. Miss Macassey. SECOND DAY. " Date to be Notified. . No.- 3 Group.—Miss Williams v. Miss Shiel; Miss' Small v. Miss Maslen; Miss Williams v. Miss Heard; Miss Shiel v. Miss Maslen; Miss Small v. Miss, ' Heard. No. 4 Group.—Miss Sinclair v. Miss ■ Everton; Miss Warsaw v. Miss CarsonMiss Sinclair v. Miss Forrester; Miss ! Everton v. Miss Carson; Miss Warsaw v. Miss Forrester. SECOND DAY (DECEMBER 1). ; Men. 1 No. 1 Group.—A: Ferkins v. France; i Bedford v. Smith; Ferkins v. Roussell; France v. Smith; Bedford v. Roussell. ! B: Dyer v. Coombe; Charters v. Pearce; . Dyer v. Lyons; Coombe v. Pearce; • Charters v. Lyons. No. 2 Group.—A: Livingstone v. Latham; J. McCarthy v. Murray: Livingstone v. Gosnell; Latham v. Murray; J. McCarthy v. Gosnell. B: Scotland v. Morrison; B. McCarthy v. Joblin; Scot- ■ land v. Marchant; Morrison v. Joblin; B. McCarthy v. Marchant. I No. 3 Group.—A: Pointon v. Pollock; | Edwards v. Buckmaster; Pointon v. | Dixon; Pollock v. Buckmaster; Edwards v. Dixon. B: Long v. Reeves; Blyth v. Plank; Long v Bundle; Reeves v. Plank; Blylh v. Bundle. No. 4 Group.—A: Glenn v. Liddle, Watt v. Gallagher; Glenn v. Driscoll; Liddle v. Gallagher; Watt v. Driscoll. B: Hickmott v. Withers; Kelly v. Davis; Hickmott v. Chick; Withers v. Davis; Kelly v. Chick. C: Clark v. • Longmore; Calcinai v. Lawton; Clark i v. Griffiths; Longmore v. Lawton; Calcinai v. Griffiths. D: Langdon v. Sissons; Jones v. Brand; Langdon v. Roberts; Sissons v. Brand; Jones v. Roberts.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19351123.2.169

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Volume CXX, Issue 126, 23 November 1935, Page 19

Word Count
609

LAWN TENNIS Evening Post, Volume CXX, Issue 126, 23 November 1935, Page 19

LAWN TENNIS Evening Post, Volume CXX, Issue 126, 23 November 1935, Page 19

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert