Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE POULTRY BILL

,(To the Editor.)

Sir,—Reading through .Mr. Leger's letter on this subject, one must be struck by the term "industry," and there could1 JL conceive, be no opposition, whatever if the poultry industry" would York for a mil controlling only such "poultry industry. It is because it wants, however to rope m people who keep as few as 25 hens (it Was originally intended to be 12 only), and who cannot by any imagination 'be considered as engaged in the poultry industry that .all the opposition came about —I am, etc., ■ '

WIBBLEMAG.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19330316.2.61.2

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Volume CXV, Issue 63, 16 March 1933, Page 10

Word Count
94

THE POULTRY BILL Evening Post, Volume CXV, Issue 63, 16 March 1933, Page 10

THE POULTRY BILL Evening Post, Volume CXV, Issue 63, 16 March 1933, Page 10

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert